In today’s competitive job market, candidates often invest significant time and effort into the recruitment process, only to be left in uncertainty. Many report being assured of offers after multiple rounds of interviews, yet receiving little to no follow-up from employers. This lack of communication, often referred to as “ghosting,” has become a growing concern, leaving applicants stressed and questioning the professionalism of companies. The emotional toll of waiting for promised updates and the unpredictability of hiring decisions has sparked widespread discussion on social media platforms.
Candidate Left in Limbo After Final Interview
A recent Reddit post highlighted this frustration when a user described completing five rounds of interviews and being explicitly told they were a great fit for the role. The hiring manager assured the candidate that an offer letter would be sent, but weeks went by without any response. Despite following up twice, the only reply was an automated message stating that candidates were still under review. The user described the experience as emotionally exhausting, emphasizing the anxiety of waiting for communication that never arrived.
Netizens Urge Accountability
The post attracted numerous responses, with many encouraging the candidate to publicly expose the company’s behavior. One commenter emphasized the importance of naming and shaming companies that mistreat candidates, while another shared their experience of doing so without it affecting future job prospects. Some users noted that many hesitate to share identifying information to avoid possible backlash from the employer. Others recounted situations where candidates eventually received offers after weeks of silence, though sometimes under less favorable terms.
Reddit users also shared a variety of similar experiences. One mentioned being asked to delay their joining due to orientation scheduling, while another described being rejected despite meeting with top executives. Some users shared that delayed offers were ultimately accepted, even if the salary or timing was not ideal. These accounts illustrate the inconsistent nature of recruitment and the unpredictability candidates face despite prior assurances.
Several commenters offered advice for navigating such situations, including direct communication with recruiters and maintaining professional detachment from outcomes. One highlighted that candidates cannot rely on past positive feedback and must be prepared for sudden changes.
Candidate Left in Limbo After Final Interview
A recent Reddit post highlighted this frustration when a user described completing five rounds of interviews and being explicitly told they were a great fit for the role. The hiring manager assured the candidate that an offer letter would be sent, but weeks went by without any response. Despite following up twice, the only reply was an automated message stating that candidates were still under review. The user described the experience as emotionally exhausting, emphasizing the anxiety of waiting for communication that never arrived.
Netizens Urge Accountability
The post attracted numerous responses, with many encouraging the candidate to publicly expose the company’s behavior. One commenter emphasized the importance of naming and shaming companies that mistreat candidates, while another shared their experience of doing so without it affecting future job prospects. Some users noted that many hesitate to share identifying information to avoid possible backlash from the employer. Others recounted situations where candidates eventually received offers after weeks of silence, though sometimes under less favorable terms.
Reddit users also shared a variety of similar experiences. One mentioned being asked to delay their joining due to orientation scheduling, while another described being rejected despite meeting with top executives. Some users shared that delayed offers were ultimately accepted, even if the salary or timing was not ideal. These accounts illustrate the inconsistent nature of recruitment and the unpredictability candidates face despite prior assurances.
Several commenters offered advice for navigating such situations, including direct communication with recruiters and maintaining professional detachment from outcomes. One highlighted that candidates cannot rely on past positive feedback and must be prepared for sudden changes.
You may also like
IMF raises India's growth projection despite Trump's tariffs
EPFO's New Withdrawal Rule: Mandatory 25% Balance and Longer Wait for Full PF Withdrawal
Martin Clunes set to revisit Doc Martin but there's a surprise for fans
I vowed this would never happen - but Donald Trump has changed me
David Coote's possible maximum prison term as ex-Prem ref guilty of indecent child image
